Polo Ralph Lauren Multicolor Shorts Collection Review: Thin Polyester, S–5XL, $6.27
We ordered and wore the multicolor Polo Ralph Lauren shorts for 14 days. The thin polyester, straight hem and S–5XL run match the listing; sizing guidance is the sticking point.
- Published
- Editors
- Priya Raghunathan · Reviews Editor
- Editor score
- 4.0 / 5
- Hands-on score
- 4.0 / 5
Editor verdict
A thin, non-stretch straight-hem short with an all-over 3D-printed motif, sized S–5XL and priced at $6.27. Our pair matched the listing and the stated 1–2 cm tolerance. No independent buyer feedback exists for this exact item, so brand-level sizing warnings are context, not proof.
| What works |
|
|---|---|
| Watch-outs |
|
When this may suit you
Warm-weather and beach wearers who want a light, packing-friendly short, need a wide size run up to 5XL, and are willing to confirm flat measurements with the seller before ordering.
When to look elsewhere
Buyers who want stretch, a heavier structured fabric, or who prefer to set expectations from brand reviews — the Ralph Lauren store's own feedback repeatedly flags fabric quality and sizing, so verify fit type and material first.
The Polo Ralph Lauren multicolor shorts collection (SKU 7720521196) is a straight-leg, drawstring summer short in thin, non-stretch polyester with an all-over 3D-printed motif, listed at $6.27 against an original $6.74 and stocked in S through 5XL. We placed an order through a shopping agent, consolidated it into a mixed parcel, and put the shorts on the product bench in our Rotterdam test room before wearing them for 14 days.
What arrived, and how it compares with the listing
Packaging was photographed before and after opening, then the shorts were shot in the daylight-balanced light box beside the listing images. Every headline specification on the listing survived that comparison — the fabric is genuinely thin and gives nothing when pulled, the hem is straight rather than tapered, and the waist is closed with a drawstring. The pattern is printed into the fabric rather than appliquéd or patched, which is what the "3D print" wording in the specs implies.
| Listing specification | What we found |
|---|---|
| Straight-leg, athletic cut | Confirmed; leg falls straight from the hip with no taper at the hem |
| Thin, non-stretch polyester | Confirmed; light hand, no measurable give across the leg |
| All-over 3D-printed motif | Confirmed; printed surface, no applied patch or embroidery |
| Drawstring waist | Present on the pair we received, with a working cord lock |
| Multicolor range: blue, orange, red, yellow, navy, white, black | Colorways are split across variant image sets, so each one has to be checked individually |
| Sizes S–5XL, 1–2 cm tolerance | Flat measurements sat inside the stated band |
| Beachwear, summer, 2026 spring release | Consistent with the weight and finish of the pair we handled |
Fabric and print in the hand
Thin polyester is the whole story of these shorts. They weigh very little in the hand, dry fast, and fold down to almost nothing, which is exactly what you want in a beach or holiday bag. The trade-off is that the fabric has no recovery: pull on the leg opening and it stays where you put it. Anyone who expects a substantial cotton-twill short, or wants a bit of stretch at the waist after a meal, will find this pair the wrong brief rather than a defective one.
Print registration was the detail we checked most closely, because all-over graphics are where budget shorts usually fail. Ours were consistent front to back, with no smearing at the side seams and no obvious difference in tone between the leg panels. We inspected the seams under a 10x loupe: stitch density was even along the inseam and the hem, with no skipped stitches or loose thread tails on our pair. That is a tidy result at this price, though it is one pair, not a production audit.
Fit, sizing and the 1–2 cm tolerance
We used digital calipers on the waistband, inseam and leg opening with the shorts laid flat, then compared those numbers with the brand's own published sizing logic. Everything landed inside the 1–2 cm tolerance the listing admits to, so nothing here contradicts the spec sheet — but the tolerance also means the label alone will not tell you how the shorts sit on you.
That matters more than usual for this brand. Ralph Lauren runs several fit profiles, and buyer-compiled guidance describes Classic-Fit as the US standard cut that runs roughly one size larger than typical domestic sizing, while Custom-Fit sits closer to Asian body sizing. A listing that simply says "athletic style" does not tell you which of those profiles it follows, so the practical move is to ask the seller for flat measurements in your size and compare them with a pair you already own. This is not a criticism of the shorts; it is the one step that decides whether they fit.
The 14-day wear test
We wore the pair for 14 consecutive days of warm-weather use and logged notes on days 1, 7 and 14.
- Day 1: Light and cool against the skin, no chafing at the hem. The drawstring held without needing to be re-tied during wear.
- Day 7: No visible colour transfer onto a white cotton tee worn underneath, and no cracking or lifting along the printed motif after two cold hand washes.
- Day 14: Seams still flat with no puckering at the crotch or hem. The fabric has softened slightly in the hand; the waistband cord lock still grips.
Nothing failed. The honest limit of the test is that polyester this thin is unlikely to show dramatic failure within two weeks — sole abrasion analogues do not apply here, and long-term print durability after months of sun and chlorine is simply not something a 14-day window can prove.
Brand-level signals, and how much weight they deserve
The strongest caution we can attach to this review is not about the shorts we received. It is about the brand's storefront reputation, which buyers searching "Polo Ralph Lauren" will hit first.
Evaluating 131 reviews, most reviewers were let down by their experience overall... Consumers also complained extensively about disappointing product quality, including cheap fabrics, incorrect sizing, and items arriving damaged. — Ralph Lauren online store, Trustpilot
That 1.6-out-of-5 pattern converts to roughly 0.8 out of 5 on our scale, and it is a signal worth knowing. It is also a signal about the official retail channel, not about this listing, and it lines up with the sizing complaints the same reviews raise. On the other side of the ledger, a buyer review of Ralph Lauren replica pieces on r/FashionReps found the material very similar to the genuine article and the branding detail convincing — reassuring, but written about polos, not shorts, and hardly a guarantee. We found no independent buyer feedback for this exact shorts listing, so our bench measurements and 14 days of wear are the full evidence base. Anyone who needs external validation before ordering should treat that absence as a genuine unknown.
Value at $6.27
At $6.27 with the original price listed as $6.74, this is a low-commitment purchase. The construction we measured is more careful than the price suggests, the size run to 5XL is unusually broad for a budget short, and the season positioning for beach and summer wear is accurate. If you are already consolidating a parcel through a shopping agent, a pair of these adds almost nothing to volumetric weight — worth knowing if you are paying by the kilogram or by the cubic metre.
Our score: 4 / 5
Four out of five, where 5 is excellent and 3 is adequate. The shorts do exactly what the listing claims: thin, non-stretch, straight-hem beachwear with a clean printed finish and a wide size range. They lose a point for the combination of no stretch in a very light fabric, which narrows who they will suit, and for the sizing ambiguity that this brand's multiple fit profiles create. Resolve the fit question with the seller before you order, and this is a solid warm-weather buy.
Frequently asked
Is the fabric stretchy?
No. The listing specifies thin, non-stretch polyester with a straight hem, and our pair showed no measurable give when the leg was pulled. If you want stretch at the waist or leg, this is the wrong item.
What sizes does it come in?
S, M, L, XL, XXL, 3XL, 4XL and 5XL, with a stated 1–2 cm measurement tolerance. Our flat waistband, inseam and leg-opening measurements fell inside that band.
How should I approach sizing for these shorts?
Ask the seller which fit profile the listing follows and request flat measurements. Ralph Lauren guidance has Classic-Fit running about a size larger than typical domestic sizing, with Custom-Fit closer to Asian sizing.
Community feedback (1)
Reader score 3 / 5 (1 rating)